about
michael's website
Email Michael
rss feed  

Archives
October 2017
November 2016
November 2015
April 2014
February 2014
August 2013
October 2012
August 2012
February 2012
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
February 2011
January 2011
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
Passenger case limits

In terms of the new laws, there are no limits on passengers’ claims, although they don’t qualify for much compensation either.  In terms of the old Road Accident Fund Act, a passenger’s claim was limited to R25 000,00.  A recent judgment has held that this limit is unconstitutional and the matter will now no doubt be taken on appeal by the Road Accident Fund. 

 am quite sure that they will be unsuccessful, and it is something I reported in my legal newsletter more than a year ago, and placed on record at that time that my firm had taken the same point in pleadings in a number of our bigger passenger cases but which unfortunately the defendants either had not picked up or reacted to.  In other words, we have pleaded that the limit is unconstitutional, in a number of our bigger cases, for the last year or so with the intent of taking this matter to the Constitutional Court.  I am only sorry that other attorneys will get there first! 

It seems a lot of attorneys have always been reluctant to bring a challenge on this basis, thinking that the Constitutional Court had heard this case before, whereas they always confuse the fact that a Johannesburg firm at that time brought a challenge based on the new Constitution, but for a case that had happened before the new Constitution came into effect in 1994.  The Constitutional Court rejected their argument largely on the basis that the legislation could not be retrospective and it appears that leading firms of attorneys took this to mean that the passenger case limit was valid when in fact clearly it was not. 

In any event, there is some way to go still, with the case being heard, but attorneys should not settle any substantial cases, that exceed the R25 000,00 limit, before this matter is finalised, as I warned in an article in my newsletter at www.legalnewsletter.co.za a year ago.

Posted by Michael de Broglio on Thursday 01-Jul-10


Passenger case limits

Comments

Jeff  said...
on Wednesday 15-Sep-10 03:36 PM
Speaking to an RAF handler today, she says this judgement has worked in favour of the RAF. The judgement apparently say that claimants prior to the 2008 amendment can get no more than they would under the Amended Act, or words to that effect They interpret this to say that such claimants must now prove 30% disability to claim general damages, effectively placing many claimants in a worse position than before! It seems the Judge boobed in the wording of his judgement ,leading to unintended consequences! This is why the RAF has put settlement of all such claims on hold!
Can anyone confirm this to be the case, and any idea when the issue will be resolved?

Jeff  said...
on Wednesday 14-Jul-10 12:33 PM
Does anybody know whether the RAF are definitely appealing against the judgement in the case brought by Marius Kruger?

Post a Comment

* Your name:
* email:  (will not be published)
   Security Code:
*Security Code: Please type the above characters

 

Home




Johannesburg Web Design South Africa